Śrīla Prabhupāda.  Yes. For example, the earth contains everything necessary for a plant to grow, but you must first put a seed in the earth. Similarly, a mother has within her womb all the necessary ingredients for creating another body, but the father must first inject the semen, or seed, into the womb; then the child will develop. A dog forms a dog's body, and a human forms a human body. Why? Because all the required ingredients are there, respectively.
We find a certain quantity of chemicals in my body, a smaller quantity in an ant's body, and a greater quantity in an elephant's body. So, if I can create so many more chemicals than an ant, and an elephant can create so many more chemicals than I can, then just think how many more chemicals God can create!  This  is the basis on which scientists should consider how hydrogen and oxygen combine to form water. Otherwise, they cannot identify the source of the vast quantities of hydrogen and oxygen required to make the oceans. But we can. This hydrogen and oxygen exist in the  virāṭ-rūpa , the universal body of the Lord. Why do the scientists fail to understand this plain truth? Hydrogen and oxygen combine to form the water in the seas. We both accept this fact. But the scientists are surprised to hear that the origin of this huge quantity of hydrogen and oxygen is actually  acintya-śakti , or the inconceivable mystic power of the Lord.
The Definition of "Life" is as follows:
Dr. Singh.  I have noticed a disagreement within the scientific community over the definition of  living  and  nonliving . Some say that if a being can reproduce, it is alive. Therefore, they claim to have created life because certain large DNA molecules[14] produced in the laboratory can replicate themselves; that is, they can reproduce other chains of molecules by their own power. Some scientists say these DNA molecules are living, and others say they are not.
Śrīla Prabhupāda.  Because somebody is saying one thing and somebody is saying another, their knowledge must be imperfect.
Dr. Singh.  Can we define  living  as "containing consciousness" and  nonliving  as "without consciousness"?
Śrīla Prabhupāda.  Yes, that is the difference. As Kṛṣṇa says in the  Bhagavad-gītā  (2.17),  avināśi tu tad viddhi yena sarvam idaṁ tatam : "That which is spread all over the body is indestructible." Anyone can understand what is spread all over a living body; it is consciousness. According to our consciousness at the time of death, we are awarded a particular bodily shape. If you have a dog's consciousness, you will get a dog's body, and if you have a godly consciousness, you get a demigod's body.[15] Kṛṣṇa gives everyone the freedom to take whatever body he wants:
yānti deva-vratā devān pitṝn yānti pitṛ-vratāḥ bhūtāni yānti bhūtejyā yānti mad-yājino 'pi mām
"Those who worship the demigods will take birth among the demigods; those who worship ghosts and spirits will take birth among such beings; those who worship ancestors go to the ancestors; and those who worship Me will live with Me." (Bg. 9.25)
Darwin Condemned the statement of the same as the one of the statements of the same.