زندگی
Şرې Caitanya  caritameta
[[Madhya-lijā Ch 6 ]]
Therefore the conclusion is that only a direct presentation can be considered evidence. An interpretation cannot be accepted as evidence, but may be considered proof of evidence.
In  Bhagavad-gitā , at the very beginning it is stated:
dhṛtarāṣṭra uvāca  
 dharma-kṣetre kuru-kṣetre  
 samavetā yuyutsavaḥ  
 māmakāḥ pāṇḍavāś caiva  
 kim akurvata ṣañiava
The statements of  Bhagavad-gītā  are themselves proof that there is a place of religious pilgrimage named Kurukṣetra where the Pāṇḍavas and Kurus met to fight. After meeting there, what did they do? This was Dhṛtarāṣṭra’s inquiry to Sañjaya. Although these statements are very clear, atheists try to interpret different meanings of the words  dharma-kṣetra  and  kuru-kṣetra . Therefore Śrīla Jīva Gosvāmī has warned us not to depend on any kind of interpretation. It is better to take the verses as they are, without interpretation.
TEXT 1366
জীবের অন্ত্বি-বিষ্ঠা দুই – শখ-গোময় । 
শ্রুতি-বাক্যে সেই দুই মহা-পবিত্র হয় ॥ ১৩৬ ॥
jīvera asthi-viṣṭhā dui—śaṅkha-gomaya śruti-vākye sei dui mahā-pavitra haya
SYNONYMS
jīvera —of the living entity;  asthi —the bone;  viṣṭhā —stool;  dui —two;  śaṅkha —conchshell;  go-maya —cow dung;  śruti-vākye —in the words of the Vedic version;  sei —that;  dui —two;  mahā —greatly;  pavitra —pure;  haya —are.
TRANSLATION
Caitanya Mahāprabhu continued: “Conchshells and cow dung are nothing but the bones and the stool of some living entities, but according to the Vedic version they are both considered very pure.
PURPORT
According to Vedic principles, bones and dung are generally considered very impure. If one touches a bone or stool, he must take a bath immediately. That is the Vedic injunction. Yet the  Vedas  also enjoin that a conchshell, although the