Tevyt 1791
The liberation of Sārvabhauma Bhattācārva
২০১1
TPANSIATION
Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu continued:  “The Supreme Personality of God-head is the central point of all relationships, acting in devotional service to Him is one’s real occupation, and the attainment of love of Godhead is the ultimate goal of life. These three subject matters are described in Vedic literature.
PURPORT
Bhagavad-gītā  also confirms this statement (Bg. 15.15).  Vedaiś ca sarvair aham  eva  vedyaḥ : the actual purpose in reading the  Vedas  is to learn how to become a devotee of the Supreme Lord. The Lord Himself advises,  man-manā bhava mad-bhakto mad-yājī māṁ namaskuru  (Bg. 9.34). Therefore, after studying the  Vedas , one must then execute devotional service by thinking always of the Supreme Lord ( man-manā ), becoming His devotee, worshiping Him and always offering Him obeisances. This is called  viṣṇu-ārādhana , and it is the supreme occupational duty of all human beings. It is properly discharged in the  varṇāśrama-dharma  system, which divides society into  brahmacarya ,  gṛhastha ,  vānaprastha ,  sannyāsa , and  brāhmaṇa ,  kṣatriya ,  vaiśya  and  śūdra . This is the whole scheme of Vedic civilization. However, this institution is very difficult to establish in this age; therefore Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu advises that we not worry about the Vedic system of  varṇāśrama-dharma . Rather, we should take directly to the chanting of the Hare Kṛṣṇa  mantra  and simply hear about the Supreme Personality of Godhead from pure devotees. This is the process recommended by Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, and this is the purpose for studying the  Vedas
TEXT 179
আর থে বৈ-কিছু কহে, সকলই কল্পনা।।
স্বতঃপ্রমাণ  বেদ-বাক্যে কল্পেন লক্ষণা ॥ ১৭৯ ॥
āra ye ye-kichu kahe, sakala-i kalpanā svataḥ-pramāṇa veda-vākye kalpena lakṣaṇā
SYNONYMS
āra —except this;  ye   ye —whatever;  kichu —something;  kahe —says;  sakala-i —all;  kalpanā —imagination;  svataḥ-pramāṇa —self-evident;  veda-vākye —in the Vedic version;  kalpena —he imagines;  lakṣaṇā —an interpretation.
TRANSLATION
“If one tries to explain the Vedic literature in a different way, he is indulging in imagination. Any interpretation of the self-evident Vedic version is simply imaginary.