184
Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam
[Canto 10, Ch. 10]
many possible claimants, who is the rightful claimant? Not to ascertain this but instead to maintain the body by sinful activities is not good.
TEXT 12
एवं साधारणं देहमव्यक्तप्रभवाप्ययम् । को विद्वानात्मसात् कृत्वा हन्ति जन्तूनृतेऽसतः॥१२॥
evam sādhāraṇam deham avyakta-prabhavāpyayam ko vidvān ātmasāt kṛtvā hanti jantūn ṛte 'sataḥ
evam —in this way;  sādhāraṇam —common property;  deham —the body;  avyakta —from unmanifested nature;  prabhava —manifested in that way;  apyayam —and again merged with the unmanifested (“for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return”);  kaḥ —who is that person;  vidvān —one who is actually in knowledge;  ātmasāt kṛtvā —claiming as his own;  hanti —kills;  jantūn —poor animals;  ṛte —except;  asataḥ —rascals who have no knowledge, no clear understanding.
TRANSLATION
This body, after all, is produced by the unmanifested nature and again annihilated and merged in the natural elements. Therefore, it is the common property of everyone. Under the circumstances, who but a rascal claims this property as his own and while maintaining it commits such sinful activities as killing animals just to satisfy his whims? Unless one is a rascal, one cannot commit such sinful activities.
PURPORT
Atheists do not believe in the existence of the soul. Nonetheless, unless one is very cruel, why should one kill animals unnecessarily? The body is a manifestation of a combination of matter. In the beginning it was nothing, but by a combination of matter it has come into existence. Then again, when the combination is dismantled, the body will no longer exist.