60
Śrīmad-Bhāgavatam
[Canto 4, Ch. 2]
some are in the mode of ignorance. Lord Viṣṇu takes charge of persons who are advanced Kṛṣṇa conscious Vaiṣṇavas, and Lord Brahmā takes charge of persons who are very much attached to material activities, but Lord Śiva is so kind that he takes charge of persons who are in gross ignorance and whose behavior is lower than that of the animals. Therefore Lord Śiva is especially called auspicious.
TEXT 16
तस्मा उन्मादनाथाय नष्टशौचाय दुह्रदे । दत्ता बत मया साध्वी चोदिते परमेष्ठिना ॥१६॥
tasmā unmāda-nāthāya naṣṭa-śaucāya durhṛde dattā bata mayā sādhvī codite parameṣṭhinā
tasmai —to him;  unmāda-nāthāya —to the lord of ghosts;  naṣṭa-śaucāya —being devoid of all cleanliness;  durhṛde —heart filled with nasty things;  dattā —was given;  bata —alas;  mayā —by me;  sādhvī —Satī;  codite —being requested;  parameṣṭhinā —by the supreme teacher (Brahmā).
TRANSLATION
On the request of Lord Brahmā I handed over my chaste daughter to him, although he is devoid of all cleanliness and his heart is filled with nasty things.
PURPORT
It is the duty of parents to hand over their daughters to suitable persons, just befitting their family tradition in cleanliness, gentle behavior, wealth, social position, etc. Dakṣa was repentant that, on the request of Brahmā, who was his father, he had handed over his daughter to a person who, according to his calculation, was nasty. He was so angry that he did not acknowledge that the request was from his father. He referred to Brahmā as  parameṣṭhī , the supreme teacher in the universe; because of his temperament of gross anger, he was not even prepared to accept Brahmā as his father. In other words he accused even Brahmā of being less intelligent because he had advised Dakṣa to hand over his beautiful daughter to such a nasty fellow. In anger one forgets everything, and thus Dakṣa, in anger, not only accused the great Lord Śiva, but he criticized his father, Lord Brahmā, for his not very sanguine advice that Dakṣa hand over his daughter to Lord Śiva.