(vil)

I hope I have made my point clear. J am a physicist
myself but am deeply absorbed in tne Vedanta philsophy
and its scientific interpretation.

I have written about 20 stanzas by now of what I call
Viswa-upanishad, I will take probably a few years before I
finalise every word of it. It will contain all modern scientific
knowledge about universe.

Iam deeply interested in the propagation of the great
teachings and infinite knowledge contained in our Upanishads
and Gita. There is no knowledge superior to it and there is
no book equal to it. If we put these Upanishads and Gita on
one side and all books of the world on the other , the Gita wili
be still superior.

It is therefore that we should make every effort to spread
the message of this vital books to the world and preserve that
great cultural heritage which shun signs of invasion and
annihilation by the flood of material ideas spreading through
the length and breadth of our country.

Dear Dr. Naik,

Your letter dated 20 March 1960 redirected from my
Hd Qrs. (Vrindaban) is duly in hand and I am very much
encouraged to go through the contents which are full of valu-
able informations. The subject matter discussed in my article
under reference is authorised as far as it refers to the conclu-
sion of Geeta.

I may also inform you that my concept of anti-matter is
exactly what you call it anti-material. Technically it may be
that I could not express the exact word used by the physicist
but I have tried to explain the word anti-matter in the light
and sense of what you say as antt-material which is spirit.
But spirit is not a=qzyz as you have pointed out. In the Bhag-
wat Geeta The Supreme Truth or the Absolute Personality
of Godhead is the transcendental yey and the two energies
namely yaraand apara are emanations from Him. The Apara or
the Inferior material energy may consist ofmany other elements
